Junk DNA after all? by David Snoke | May 14, 2013 | Uncategorized | 1 comment Another entry in the great debate. A plant that has a very small genome with little “junk”. Comments? Does this change the conclusions many people had from the ENCODE project? The bladderwort plant: Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window) Related 1 Comment David Snoke on May 15, 2013 at 17:12 Is this logically the same as saying that you have found a species with no tail, so therefore tails are useless junk? Or perhaps, I have found a simple worm species with no head, so therefore heads are useless? Reply Submit a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Current ye@r * Leave this field empty Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email.